Battle of the Crater -147th Anniversary

Today, friends, is the 147th anniversary of the Battle of the Crater. Fought in the trenches of Petersburg, it is inevitably one of the greatest Federal blunders of the Civil War. While well conceived, the battle was lost due to failures in command, most notably with IX Corps commander Major General Ambrose E. Burnside. The battle would be Burnside’s last as a field commander as Major General George Gordon Meade would bring charges against him afterwards. Total casualties at the Crater would be nearly 5,300 with the majority being Union soldiers: 3,800. Late that day, as the fighting sputtered out, the two opposing armies would be in roughly the same position as they started the day in. The Battle of the Crater, even with nearly fifteen decades having passed, can only be considered a useless effusion of blood. After the smoke cleared, neither side had gained any advantage over the other.

For a more detailed narrative on the Battle of the Crater, check out my essay by clicking HERE.

###

Posted in Significant Battles, This Day In The Civil War | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Ulysses S. Grant dies

Today is the 126th anniversary of the death of US Lieutenant General Ulysses S. Grant. When most people think of the most popular, well known people of 19th Century United States they immediately think of Abraham Lincoln. While Lincoln was well known then, his greatest fame, and martyrdom, would come during the 20th Century. During the Civil War and postbellum period, Ulysses S. Grant was by far the most well known person. He would best be considered a celebrity in today’s world. However, there was nothing in his childhood and early adult life which could be used to predict his future greatness.

Hiram Ulysses Grant was born on April 27, 1822 in Point Pleasant, Ohio. His childhood was much like many 19th Century children. His father, Jesse Root Grant, owned a tannery business which was located adjacent to their home. In his autobiographical memoir, Grant recalled being disgusted by the stench of the tannery business.(i) He believed this was the cause of his lifelong abhorrence to the sight of blood. An accomplished horseman, he would ride as often as he could during his formative years. Later in life he would long for a time when he could settle with his wife, Julia Dent, on a farm and raise horses.

Young Grant would receive a general education and would be appointed to the United States Military Academy at West Point in 1839. A clerical error in his admission records would list his name as Ulysses Simpson Grant (Simpson being his mother’s maiden name). From that point forward, he would be U.S. Grant – Sam Grant to his friends. He graduated in 1843, 21st in a class of 39 cadets. Second Lieutenant Grant would be sent to St. Louis after his graduation. He was assigned to the 4th United States Infantry which was garrisoned at Jefferson Barracks. While in St. Louis he would meet his wife, Julia Dent, and a long courtship followed. He married Julia on August 22, 1848. Together, they would have four children.

His first experience in war would come during the Mexican War, during which he would receive two brevet promotions for gallantry. After the Mexican War he would be assigned to New York, the Oregon territory and California. When Grant went west, Julia stayed in St. Louis as he feared for her health during the crossing of the isthmus of Panama. Lonely to the extreme, Grant resigned his recently received captain’s commission on July 31, 1854.

Returning to Julia in St. Louis, Grant would build a home on his father-in-law’s property. There, he would try his hand at farming the rough ground west of town. The soil proved too tough for profitable row crops and he would be forced into selling firewood in St. Louis. Over the coming years he would work diligently to provide for his family, but would be forced to move to Galena, Illinois in 1860. While at Galena, Sam Grant would work at his father’s dry goods store and tannery, where he was forced to humble himself by working for his brother.

While not outwardly vocal about his political beliefs, Grant could not have failed to watch the 1860 presidential campaign as it unfolded before him. While he did not vote during the general election, he supported Democrat Stephen Douglas. With Lincoln’s election, he watched from the sidelines as the Secession Crisis erupted. After the bombardment and surrender of Fort Sumter, Grant quickly determined that he would offer his services to his country. Unfortunately, due to rumors of heavy drinking, he was unable to secure a commission in the Regular U.S. Army. Eventually he would travel to Springfield, Illinois where he would help organize the Illinois volunteer infantry regiments as the mustered into service. On June 14, 1861 he was appointed colonel of the 21st Illinois Volunteer Infantry by governor Richard Yates.

The 21st Illinois was known as a raucous unit. Grant quickly brought organization and morale to the unit and spent time drilling the volunteers. Grant would lead the regiment on assignments in Missouri. In July 1861, Grant would be surprised to learn that he had been nominated for brigadier general. It was quickly confirmed by the U.S. Senate and he would receive his commission in August. His first assignment was command of the District of Southeast Missouri, stationed at Cairo, Illinois.

Some men are best suited for business pursuits, others for farming and some for leading men in battle. Grant was best suited for battle. Having failed at farming, bill collection and sales, he would quickly find his calling leading soldiers. U.S. Grant’s first battle as commander, was the Battle of Belmont, November 6, 1861. Here he would lead a successful attack against the Confederates camped across the Mississippi River from their fort at Columbus, Kentucky. With the disorganized Rebels fleeing for safety, Grant’s troops quickly started plundering the enemy’s camp. Confederate reinforcements quickly came ashore, from Kentucky, and organized an attack against the Federals who broke in retreat to their steamer. Grant throughout the disorganized retreat was a calming influence on his men. He ensured that his troops were on the steamer and would be the last soldier to board, sliding his horse down the steep bank and onto the riverboat just as it was pulling away.(ii) While the results of the Battle of Belmont were inconclusive at best, Grant had proven himself under fire.

Over the coming 30 months of the Civil War, Grant would grasp victory from defeat on several occasions. He would be the only army commander in the United States to capture three Confederate armies (Fort Donelson, Vicksburg, Appomattox). As a commander, he would never again lead his men away from the battlefield in defeat – he would only push on – always determined to wear the enemy down and capture them. Capturing points, a tactical goal for most U.S. army commanders of the time, was never his goal. Grant wanted to force surrender and end the war. While he was often called a “butcher” for leading bloody assaults against fortified positions, the numbers do not bear this out. As a percentage of forces engaged, his armies suffered lower casualty rates than Robert E. Lee’s Army of Northern Virginia.(iii)

Grant is most well known for leading his men to victory in the following battles:

During his tenure commanding in the Civil War, Ulysses S. Grant was promoted from Colonel of U.S. Volunteers to Lieutenant General U.S. Regulars. He would be the first man to reach the rank of lieutenant general since George Washington.

  • Colonel, 21st Illinois Volunteer Infantry (June 28, 1861)
  • Brigadier General, Volunteers (August 7, 1861)
  • Major General, Volunteers (February 16, 1862)
  • Major General, U.S. Regular Army (July 4, 1863)
  • Lieutenant General, U.S. Regular Army (March 2, 1864)
  • Full General, U.S. Regular Army (July 25, 1866)

On November 3, 1868, Ulysses S. Grant was elected 18th president of the United States. He would serve two terms as president and would be forever tied to scandals including Black Friday and the Whiskey Ring. Over the past twelve decades, Grant’s legacy has been on the rebound. While he is still often thought of as a “butcher” and a corrupt president, he is in most scholarly circles considered one of the best army commanders in history and even his presidency is being reevaluated.

After his presidency, Grant and Julia would travel the world. He was a remarkable ambassador for the United States. In 1884, he would be diagnosed with terminal throat cancer – an obvious result of smoking cigars for many years. After being financially ruined by the bankruptcy of an investment banking company his son, Ulysses, Jr., was a partner in, Grant determined to use his final days writing his memoirs. He completed them days before succumbing to his cancer. His memoirs were published by Mark Twain and would be a phenomenal success, providing financial security for Julia during her remaining years.

Ulysses S. Grant died at Mount McGregor, New York on July 23, 1885. He is buried at General Grant National Monument in Manhattan, New York, next to Julia. The Grant Tomb is the largest mausoleum of its type in North America.

(i) Grant, Ulysses S., Memoirs and Selected Letters, Published by The Library of America in 1990, Pg. 22.
(ii) Ibid, Pg. 184.
(iii) Bonekemper, Edward H, III, A Victor, Not a Butcher: Ulysses S. Grant’s Overlooked Military Genius, Published by Regnery Publishing, Inc. in 2004, Appendix II, Pg. 323.

###

Posted in General Officers, This Day In The Civil War | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Battle of First Bull Run -150th Anniversary

Today is the 150th anniversary of the first large scale battle of the American Civil War -First Bull Run – or as those friends of mine in the south would call it – First Manassas. Prior to this battle, many people, north and south, believed the war would be short – perhaps decided by one battle. The first secretary of war for the Confederate States of America, LeRoy P. Walker, was so bold as to predict, “…that all of the blood shed as a result of secession could be wiped up with a handkerchief.”(i) No one could predict the outcome of the First Battle of Bull Run. Little did anyone realize that Lincoln’s demand that US Brigadier General Irvin McDowell march his Army of Northeastern Virginia to Manassas would ignite the most brutal fratricidal war in history – with perhaps the exception of McDowell himself who wanted more time to train his “green” volunteer troops. President Abraham Lincoln was equally aware of the deficiency in drill and training, responding to McDowell, “You are green, it is true, but they are green also, you are all green alike.”(ii)

As McDowell marched his army of nearly 35,000 men from Washington City on July 16, 1861, CSA Brigadier General Pierre Gustave Toutant (P.G.T.) Beauregard was aware of the tenuous situation facing his Army of the Potomac. With roughly 22,000 troops, Beauregard was concerned that he would be overrun by the larger Federal army before reinforcements could arrive from the Shenandoah Valley. McDowell’s tactical plan was to march his army in three columns towards Bull Run Creek and place the largest portion south of the Confederate right flank – effectively severing the Confederate supply line with Richmond and forcing the Confederate general to move his army south of the Rappahannock River – the next defensible line available to him. This would serve to provide some relief for the beleaguered national capital and demonstrate the power of the Federal forces Lincoln had assembled to “save the Union.”

On July 18, in an effort to put his plan in motion, McDowell ordered Brigadier Daniel Tyler to initiate a flanking movement against the southern flank of Beauregard’s forces. This would result in what would best be described as a skirmish at Blackburn’s Ford. Tyler would retreat after his division was beaten back by Confederate forces under the command of CSA Brigadier General James Longstreet. While total losses would be less than 200, McDowell was forced to change his battle plan.

On July 21, McDowell put his new plans in motion. Orders were drafted for Tyler’s Division to make a demonstration at the Stone Bridge, along the Warrenton Turnpike, while two other divisions, commanded by brigadier generals David Hunter and Samuel Heintzelman, would utilize Sudley Springs Ford to turn the left flank of the Confederate line. The battle would begin at approximately 5:15 a.m. with artillery rounds being fired from Tyler’s Division into the Confederate forces guarding the Stone Bridge. The Rebel field commander, Colonel Nathan “Shanks” Evans, quickly realized the bombardment was a feint and sent the majority of his command west to protect against a movement from the north. By 11:30 a.m., Evans new position, near Matthews Hill, was hard pressed by Federal forces. Pulling back from the Warrenton Turnpike, he would return to the main Confederate line near the Henry House. McDowell believed victory was within his grasp with his forces closing in around the small hill dominated by the Henry residence. Unfortunately, the momentum of the battle changed drastically with the arrival of CSA Brigadier General Joseph E. Johnston’s Army of the Shenandoah.

Johnston had been tasked with preventing a large scale incursion of the Shenandoah Valley by forces under the command of US Major General Robert Patterson. Patterson had received a similar directive in anticipation of McDowell’s advance on Manassas Junction: keep Johnston’s forces engaged in the Shenandoah Valley to prevent a move to reinforce Beauregard. In this Patterson failed miserably. Johnston was able to quickly mobilize his army and arrived at Manassas Junction late on the morning of July 21. This quick deployment was made possible by the first successful military use of a railroad. Thus, when Confederate fortunes appeared bleak near Henry House Hill, the tide turned.

Recently promoted and little known Brigadier General Thomas J. Jackson would arrive at Henry House Hill around noon. With the vastly overwhelmed Confederate line now disintegrating, the timing could not have been better. Jackson quickly conferred with Brigadier General Barnard Bee, who would soon be killed in action, and was advised, “The enemy are driving us.” To this Jackson responded, “Then, Sir, we will give them the bayonet.”(iii) Jackson’s brigade quickly entered the confused fray, surprising the Federal forces and quickly changing the complexion of the battle. By 4:00 p.m., repeated Confederate assaults along the Henry House Hill line would force the retreat of the Union line. Realizing the fight had turned against him, and unable to organize his fear stricken army, McDowell ordered a general retreat across Bull Run Creek. Thus ended the First Battle of Bull Run which would repeat itself fourteen months later when another Federal force, the Army of Virginia, would retreat pellmell all the way back to the defenses of Washington City.

With news of the battle reaching the general population, moods changed. The combined losses at Manassas were staggering: nearly 5,000 killed, wounded, missing and captured. No longer was it believed that the war would be over quickly. Patriotic fervor would quickly swell the ranks of armies north and south, east and west. Across the south people rejoiced in the streets while its commanders, Beauregard, Johnston and Jackson were extolled as heroes. And while the Confederate victory was not solely the result of the actions of Thomas Jackson, he would earn the sobriquet, Stonewall – a moniker that would become synonymous with him – even today. Meanwhile in the north a quiet determination took hold. Quickly, a new army leader would emerge: Major General George B. McClellan. While he brought order to the somber, defeated ranks a new mantra would appear in the press and be voiced by northerners, “On to Richmond.” Little did the populace know, nor could they in their worst dreams imagine, the toll the war would take over the coming three years: 620,000 dead Americans and many more disfigured and forever scarred. July 1861 would forever herald the start of a new phase in the story of America – a story that still defines us today – a story of death, anguish and brothers fighting brothers – but most importantly a new birth of freedom.

While I could not attend today’s sesquicentennial activities at Manassas National Battlefield Park, my heart will never forget the last and final sacrifice which our patriots made on the bloody fields near Henry House Hill.

For a more in depth narrative of the First Battle of Bull Run click HERE.

To view my collection of photos of Manassas National Battlefield click HERE.

(i) Gipson, Lawrence H., Third Millennium Library paper, “The Collapse of the Confederacy.” To read this paper, click HERE.
(ii) McPherson, James M., Battle Cry of Freedom: The Civil War Era, published by Oxford University Press on November 6, 2003, Pg. 336.
(iii) Robertson, James I, Jr., Stonewall Jackson: The Man, The Soldier, The Legend, published by MacMillan Publishing in 1997, Pg. 264.

###

Posted in Civil War Sesquicentennial, Sesquicentennial Events, Significant Battles, This Day In The Civil War | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Washington DC Civil War Era Graves -a photo essay

Last month I was in Washington, DC for work. I had the opportunity to visit several historic cemeteries during the evening hours after work. My visit included stops at Rock Creek Cemetery, the U.S. Soldiers’ and Airmen’s Home National Cemetery, Glenwood Cemetery and Oak Hill Cemetery. These cemeteries are all historically significant and serve as the final resting place for many historic figures. I published a short blog article during my visit about the beauty Oak Hill Cemetery. If you ever find yourself in our nation’s capital, I would highly recommend stopping by these cemeteries. The monuments are quite interesting and you are bound to come across plenty of interesting figures from the Civil War.

Some of the more interesting historic figures I paid my respects to are famed Civil War photographer Alexander Gardner, Major General Jesse L. Reno, Brigadier General Lorenzo Thomas, Confederate Major General Cadmus M. Wilcox, Secretary of War Edwin McMasters Stanton, Confederate Brigadier General Frank C. Armstrong, Major General William H. French, Brigadier General Henry J. Hunt, Major General John A. Logan and Major General David S. Stanley.

I know I have posted several Civil War era grave photo essays recently, but I am just about caught up. I still have two upcoming photo essays on Civil War era graves: Illinois and Alabama. I am also working on several soldier profiles for those of you that are interested in narratives on soldiers and officers. Stay tuned.

To view my photo essay from my trip to Washington, DC, click on the following link:

Mike’s photo essay on Washington DC Civil War Era Graves

###

Posted in Photo Essays (miscellaneous) | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Michigan Civil War Era Graves -a photo essay

This past month I was in southeast Michigan for work meetings. I took a day of vacation so I could pay my respects to some of the Civil War soldiers who are resting in peace under her soil. Michigan would send over 90,000 of her young men to fight in the American Civil War. They would be mustered into 34 volunteer infantry regiments, numerous Regular Army regiments, one sharpshooter regiment, one engineer regiment and eleven cavalry regiments. Another 300 would serve their country in the U.S. Navy. Nearly 15,000 of these soldiers would die fighting for the Union.

During this trip I was able to visit the graves of Russell A. Alger, Philip St. George Cooke, Andrew Porter, Alpheus S. Williams and Israel B. Richardson. Additionally I paid my respects to several Civil War Medal of Honor recipients and U.S. Senator Zachariah Chandler – one of the original founders of the Republican Party and member of the Joint Committee on the Conduct of the War.

To view my photo essay from this trip, click on the following link:

Michigan Civil War Era Graves -a photo essay

###

Posted in Photo Essays (miscellaneous) | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

148th Anniversary of the conclusion of fighting at Gettysburg

Today is the 148th anniversary of the third day of fighting at the Battle of Gettysburg. This battle was destined to become the epic battle in a war of epic battles: Shiloh, Antietam, Fredericksburg, Stones RiverChancellorsville, the Wilderness, Spotsylvania, Cold Harbor and Franklin. None of these battles would match the casualty rolls which occurred during the summer of 1863 at the sleepy crossroads village of Gettysburg, Pennsylvania.

Over the intervening fourteen decades, the landscape around Gettysburg has changed significantly. These changes were not only created by buildings, commercial development and urban sprawl. Much of it has been caused by the slow creep of the landscape. Fields becoming woodlots, woodlots becoming open fields and orchards vanishing into prairie grass. On this anniversary of the sanguinary fight at Gettysburg, I thought it might be appropriate to offer a link to an article which I wrote in October 2009: Gettysburg National Military Park – A Study in Contrasts. This article highlights the National Park Service’s efforts to restore the sight lines which existed in the 1860′s. If you have not been to Gettysburg recently, I would recommend you review this article. The park service has done a fine job at Gettysburg.

Gettysburg National Military Park – A Study in Contrasts

Shortly after this article was published, the National Park Service provided an update on the rehabilitation efforts at Gettysburg. To review this article click on the following link:

Gettysburg National Military Park – Rehabilitation Update

###

Posted in Announcements, Battlefield Wanderings, General Musings, Significant Battles | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Touring Guides by Clint Johnson -book reviews

A few weeks ago I received a package from John F. Blair Publisher -a publishing house for a wide range of subjects based in Winston-Salem, North Carolina. In this package were two recently released second edition tour guides: Touring Virginia’s and West Virginia’s Civil War Sites and Touring the Carolinas’ Civil War Sites, both by Clint Johnson. As my regular blog readers know, I do a lot of travel. Much of my travel is to the mid-Atlantic region which includes the Virginias and Carolinas. While I know many of the Civil War sites in these states like the back-of-my-hand, I often want to explore new sites while I’m traveling. Unfortunately for the explorer in me, many of the coolest Civil War historic sites are off the beaten path and not well marked. It is very easy to drive by them without knowing they are there. For this reason, I am a proponent of the online Civil War travel guides such as CivilWarTraveler.com and CivilWarDiscoveryTrail.org. The drawback of these sites is that you can’t easily take them with you while you travel -unless you have internet access. This is where books like Johnson’s come in so handy. You can easily plan your travel while sitting in your office or living room, print out a map of your route, throw the book in your carry on bag and head out. It convenient and easy. Most importantly, you have the guide with you while you are traveling.

Both of Johnson’s books are well made. Each book is packed with pictures and text on the sites that the author guides you to. One feature of both of these books which this reviewer truly appreciates is the way Johnson organizes the sites into separate tours which are geographically connected and can be completed in a reasonable amount of time. As an example, Touring Virginia’s and West Virginia’s Civil War Sites includes twenty-two separate tours including: The Harpers Ferry Tour, The Lee and Jackson Tour, The Shenandoah Valley Tour, The Peninsula Tour and The Appomattox Court House Tour. Each tour includes information and directions to the area’s battlefields, forts, memorials, graves, historically significant homes and towns which played an important role in the area during the war. I would highly recommend both of these books if you are planning summer or fall vacations to the mid-Atlantic states.

Details about “Touring Virginia’s and West Virginia’s Civil War Sites
Written by: Clint Johnson
Paperback: 480 pages
Publisher: John F. Blair, Publisher
Date of Second Edition: May 1, 2011
ISBN-10: 0895874024

Details about “Touring the Carolinas’ Civil War Sites
Written by: Clint Johnson
Paperback: 464 pages
Publisher: John F. Blair, Publisher
Date of Second Edition: May 1, 2011
ISBN-10: 0895874032

###

Posted in Battlefield Wanderings, Book Reviews | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Rhode Island Civil War Era Graves -a photo essay

In December 2010, I had a business trip to New England. I was fortunate enough to have time to pay my respects to many Civil War veterans while in Rhode Island. During the Civil War, this small state would send over 25,000 of her boys, fathers and brothers to fight for the Union cause. Nearly 1,700 of them would die on distant battlefields, camps and hospitals. Several prominent officers are buried in Rhode Island including: Major General Ambrose E. Burnside, Brigadier General Isaac P. Rodman, Major General Isaac I. Stevens, Major General Gouverneur Kimble Warren and Brigadier General Hazard Stevens*.

Swan Point Cemetery, in Providence, is one of the more beautiful cemeteries I’ve visited. Besides General Burnside, other Civil War notables are buried at Swan Point including Major Sullivan Ballou and Lieutenant Colonel Elisha Hunt Rhodes. I wrote a recent article on Ballou. You can read about him by clicking HERE.

I paid my respects to all of these soldiers, and many more. To view my photo essay, click on the following link.

Mike’s photo essay on Rhode Island Civil War Era Graves

* Hazard Stevens would become most well known for climbing Mount Ranier in 1870. His climb would be the first recorded ascent of this famous mountain.

###

Posted in Photo Essays (miscellaneous) | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

The Gettysburg Foundation Goes Interactive

Earlier this year, the Gettysburg Foundation’s member website, FriendsofGettysburg.org, was updated. The new member web site offers many new features:

  • Photo sharing
  • Essay sharing
  • Park ranger’s preservation blog
  • Historical blog, “This Great Task Before Us”
  • A new perks program, Gettysburg Rewards

The new site was developed by Stage of Life, LLC. Jerry Moore, Chief Development Officer at the Gettysburg Foundation, said, “Stage of Life has delivered a totally unique experience for our members…. we’ve received nothing but positive feedback.”

Check out the Gettysburg Foundation’s new member site today: FriendsofGettysburg.org.

###

Posted in Announcements, News | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

High Dynamic Range photos – Is it cheating?

I have been an avid photographer since the late 1970′s. I grew up on Kodachrome 64 and always relished the color saturation and dynamic range the transparencies created – especially in low light with long exposures. While I was slow moving to digital SLR photography, I quickly recognized the value of being able to snap away as much as I wished, deleting the pictures that did not meet my needs. I quickly learned that digital photography, even with high end DSLR’s, had a serious shortcoming – it lacked the dynamic range of Kodachrome in low light and high contrast situations. In high contrast daylight settings, such as a heavily backlit monuments, you would either have a blown out background or a very underexposed monument. Over the years I have been able to successfully utilize flash fill to offset this phenomenon, but it is not foolproof.

Now there is another option: High Dynamic Range (HDR) processing. HDR helps bridge the gap between what the human eye sees, and what the digital camera sensor can render in an image. The human eye, unlike the camera sensor, has the ability to process a huge dynamic range allowing you to see detail in shadows even when the scene is heavily backlit. HDR software essentially combines a series of exposure bracketed photos, combining them into one image. There are, however, drawbacks and limitations. Over processed HDR images can look like they came from the pages of a comic book. Combining multiple images creates more noise. While the noise can be significantly reduced with Adobe Lightroom or Photoshop, image degradation is a potential side effect.

The top photo of Antietam’s “Bloody Lane” was created using Photomatix Pro 4.0. I combined three separate RAW images which spanned three stops to obtain this result – a picture that more closely replicates what I saw when I was taking the shots. The results are much like what I was able to capture years ago with my Canon T-90 SLR loaded with Kodachrome.

So what do you think? Do you like the HDR image? Is using software to combine images cheating or is it nothing more than what a photo technician did when processing negatives?

###

Posted in General Musings | Tagged , , , | 3 Comments